News — Brewer

elections

Brewer Storefront News Release: Judge Allows Lawsuit Alleging Frisco ISD Electoral System Violates Voting Rights Act of 1965 to Proceed

March 24, 2020 – In a critically important ruling, U.S. District Judge Amos L. Mazzant of the Eastern District of Texas denied a motion by the Frisco Independent School District (FISD) for summary judgment on March 23 – clearing the way for a Voting Rights Act lawsuit to proceed to trial.

The action filed by Brewer Storefront on behalf of plaintiff Suresh Kumar is one of the highest profile cases of its kind, as electoral bodies across North Texas come under greater scrutiny for allegedly utilizing unconstitutional voting schemes.

Brewer Storefront filed suit in federal court on April 16, 2019, on behalf of plaintiff Kumar against FISD and its trustees, alleging that the school district’s at-large election system violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The lawsuit claims that the school district’s at-large voting system denies Kumar an opportunity equal to that of white voters to elect representatives of his choice. The Storefront is the community service legal affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.

“This decision underscores what we have believed all along – the voting scheme utilized by Frisco ISD violates the Voting Rights Act and denies minority voters the opportunity to elect a candidate of their choosing,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer Storefront and lead counsel for plaintiff Suresh Kumar. “We are eager to get to trial and bring the facts of this case into full view.”

Under the current electoral system, FISD’s seven school board members are elected at large. Candidates run for specific places but do not represent a specific geographic area. The lawsuit claims the at-large; system unlawfully dilutes minority votes and allows the white voting bloc to determine the winner of every election.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Mazzant wrote that, “After a careful review of the record and the arguments presented – including Defendants’ Supplement to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment – the Court is not convinced that Defendants have met their burden demonstrating that there is no material issue of fact as to Plaintiff's claims entitling them to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendants' Motion for Summary [Judgment] should be denied."

A trial date is not yet set in this case, but a date may be set at a pretrial conference with the judge on March 31. On March 20, 2020, Brewer Storefront filed a second amended complaint in the lawsuit.

Six Asian candidates and two Hispanic candidates ran unsuccessfully for the FISD board over the four years prior to the filing of the lawsuit. All eight of the candidates of color lost to a white opponent in those FISD board elections. The only minority (Asian) candidate to prevail in an election was elected in May 2019 following the filing of the voting rights lawsuit. Six of seven FISD trustees are White.

FISD is an increasingly diverse school district. As of January 2020, the district reported enrolling 63,015 students, almost 59% of whom are students of color. FISD’s student enrollment is approximately 41.2% White, 29.3% Asian, 13.5% Hispanic, 11.1% African American and 4.2% multiracial (two or more races).

The lawsuit alleges that, “Minority-preferred candidates face a White voting bloc that represents nearly 67% of FISD’s Citizen Voting Age Population. The at-large system allows racially polarized voting within FISD to dilute minority votes and allow a plurality of White votes to block minority candidates from virtually every trustee seat in the District.”

The lawsuit alleges that unless the court directs FISD to design a single-member district or cumulative voting system, the current discriminatory system will persist.

The lawsuit states that, “Unfortunately, the Board has not accepted that as part of a booming suburban community, it must adapt to the dynamic reality of today and adopt an election system that encourages greater participation of all citizens and secures equality at the ballot box.”

Kumar, the plaintiff, is a Certified Public Accountant who is active in local civic affairs. A resident within Frisco ISD, Kumar has two daughters who have attended FISD schools. Kumar is an Asian American who moved from India to the United States in 1994. 

The Storefront has successfully challenged violations of the Voting Rights Act on behalf of other communities of interest in previous actions.

The Storefront successfully resolved Voting Rights Act cases with the Richardson Independent School District in January 2019, the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District in 2015, and the Grand Prairie Independent School District in 2014. All districts now utilize remodeled voting systems. The Storefront also secured trial victories in Voting Rights Act cases against the Irving Independent School District in 2014, the City of Farmers Branch in 2012, and the City of Irving in 2009. Those lawsuits paved the way for the formation of new voting systems and the election of minority candidates

Lake Highlands Advocate Reports on Positive Impact of Brewer Storefront Voting Rights Case

February, 19, 2020 — The Lake Highlands Advocate today reported on increased diversity among Richardson ISD (RISD) school board members following a Brewer Storefront voting rights lawsuit brought on behalf of plaintiff and former RISD board member David Tyson. A settlement reached with RISD established a new election system including five single member districts, of which two districts are minority “opportunity” districts. The Storefront is the Brewer firm’s community service legal affiliate.

 The article reported that Regina Harris, who is African American, was elected to the District 4 opportunity district, which includes the historic Hamilton Park neighborhood in November 2019. Debbie Renteria, who is Hispanic, filed for the District 3 opportunity district seat and will be taking that seat in May 2020.

 Tyson reflected on the additions of Harris and Renteria to the board: “My part is finished. We’ve achieved what we sought.’ What we wanted was opportunity for people of color to feel comfortable running. Winning is equally important, but they first have to feel comfortable enough to run. I have always said we needed to have black and brown representation on the board. I’ve put my reputation on the line and my business on the line. My job now is finished.”

Tyson also reflected on the lawsuit: ““I expected to win…because attorneys at Brewer Storefront had a track record in Grand Prairie, Irving and Carrollton-Farmers Branch, and they wouldn’t have taken the case if they didn’t think they had a reasonable chance of winning.”

Read More →

Dallas Morning News: Trial Over Voting Sees First Battle

February 18, 2009 – The Dallas Morning News reports that a federal court challenge to the City of Irving’s at-large City Council elections opened with disagreements over data interpretation.  

Brewer Storefront represented plaintiff Manuel Benavidez in a voting rights lawsuit against the city, arguing that its at-large voting method effectively denies representation to Hispanics.  

Expert David Ely testified that socioeconomic and educational disparities between Irving’s Hispanic and white populations made successful city council campaigns difficult for Hispanics.  

“It’s more difficult for candidates from this community to obtain the vote,” Ely said. He said he used 2000 U.S. Census data, 2006 Census estimates and his own projects to develop possible Hispanic voter majority districts.  

Dallas Morning News: Studies – Hispanic Candidates Blocked

July 11, 2008 – The Dallas Morning News reports that new studies released as part of a federal voting rights lawsuit brought against the City of Irving found that the city’s at-large voting system allowed white voters to block the election of Hispanic-favored candidates. 

“It is clear that whites vote as a bloc, and given they vote as a bloc, it effectively negates any chance a Hispanic has at being elected,” said attorney Bill Brewer, who represented plaintiff Manuel Benavidez in the lawsuit.  

The Brewer firm commissioned the studies on Irving City Council elections in 2002, 2005 and 2008. The article noted that they were conducted by an expert on election systems and minority voters and the founder of a database management firm specializing in Census data.  

The lawsuit requested that a U.S. district court declare that Irving’s at-large method violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and asked the city to develop a new system of electing council members.  

 

Dallas Morning News: Suit Calls Irving’s At-Large System Unfair to Hispanics

November 7, 2007 – The Dallas Morning News reports that a federal voting rights lawsuit filed against the city of Irving, Texas, and its nine city council members alleged that the at-large voting system effectively denied representation to Hispanics.  

The lawsuit requested that the court declare that the at-large election system violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and requested the development of a new system of electing the city council. The article referred to discussions about creating single-member districts. 

Attorney Bill Brewer of Brewer Storefront represented plaintiff Manuel Benavidez, who twice ran unsuccessfully for the Irving City Council. Brewer said the city was the best place to “start the debate.”  

“This is the body that is most directly involved in municipal affairs across the board,” Brewer said.  

He added that Hispanics should determine at least some council seats in a city where more than one-third of the population is Hispanic.  

"You would have an enriched community if you had different points of view at the table debating matters of municipal policy and municipal affairs,” Brewer said.